Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 133
(Coming Soon!)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 92 - Dayton - October 2003
Agenda Location5 SUBCOMMITTEE B – MISSILES AND SPACE VEHICLES
5.1 Autonomous Rendezvous and Docking
TitleAutonomous Rendezvous and Docking
PresenterDoug Zimpfer
AffiliationDraper Laboratory
Available Downloads*none
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractTo meet cost and safety objectives, space missions that involve proximity operations between two vehicles require a high level of autonomy to successfully complete their missions. The need for autonomy is primarily driven by the need to conduct complex operations outside of communication windows, and the communication time delays inherent in space missions. Autonomy also supports the goals of both NASA and the DOD to make space operations more routine, and lower operational costs by reducing the requirement for ground personnel.

NASA and the DoD have several programs underway that require a much higher level of autonomy for space vehicles. NASA’s Space Launch Initiative (SLI) and Orbital Space Plane programs have ambitious goals of reducing costs below those for the Shuttle and improving safety beyond the Shuttle. DARPA has recently begun its Orbital Express Program to demonstrate key technologies to make satellite servicing routine. Additionally, other government programs are investigating the applications of microsats for various military missions. A common element in space operations for many NASA and DOD missions is the ability to rendezvous, inspect and/or dock with another spacecraft. For DARPA, this is required to service or refuel military satellites, while for NASA, this is needed to meet the primary OSP design reference mission of uncrewed delivery of a rescue vehicle to the International Space Station and unmanned resupply for the Alternate Access to Station Program.

A common aspect for each of these programs is autonomous rendezvous, inspection and docking. An Autonomous Mission Manager that provides highly autonomous planning, execution and monitoring of the rendezvous, inspection and docking operations is required to meet the ambitious program goals. This paper provides an overview of autonomous rendezvous and docking and an Autonomous Mission Manager (AMM) design being incorporated into many development and technology programs. The AMM provides a highly scalable level of autonomous operations, ranging from automatic execution of ground-derived plans to highly autonomous on-board planning to meet ground developed mission goals. The AMM provides the capability to automatically execute the plans and monitor the system performance. In the event of system dispersions or failures the AMM can modify plans or abort to assure overall system safety.

This paper describes the design and functionality of Draper’s AMM framework, presents concept of operations associated with the use of the AMM, and overviews some of the on-going programs.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org