Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee

Announcements


You must first log in to access prior meeting presentations, register for a meeting, or nominate some for the Ward Award.


If you do not have a login account, or cannot remember the email address associated with your account, please click on the Application Form link below.

 
 

Login

 

E-mail: 

 

Password: 


Forgot your password?

Application Form


 

Site Search

Search our site:
 
 

Upcoming Events


Register for Meeting 133
(Coming Soon!)

 
 

Photos


Meeting Highlights New!

Subcommittee S

 
 

Prior Meetings

Abstracts may be viewed by anyone. Presentations are only available to active members who have logged in.

Meeting 132
(coming soon)

Meeting 131

Meeting 130

Meeting 129

Meeting 128

Meeting 127

Meeting 126

Meeting 125

Meeting 124

Meeting 123

Meeting 122

Meeting 121

Meeting 120

Meeting 119

Meeting 118

Meeting 117

Meeting 116

Meeting 115

Meeting 114

Meeting 113

Meeting 112

Meeting 111

Meeting 110

Meeting 109

Meeting 108

Meeting 107

Meeting 106

Meeting 105

Meeting 104

Meeting 103

Meeting 102

Meeting 101

Meeting 100

Meeting 99

Meeting 98

Meeting 97

Meeting 96

Meeting 95

Meeting 94

Meeting 93

Meeting 92

 
HomeWard Memorial AwardPlanning Advisory BoardDownloadsConstitution and By-LawsAboutHistoryContact Us

  ← Return to agenda

MeetingACGS Committee Meeting 94 - Reno - November 2004
Agenda Location5 SUBCOMMITTEE E – Flight and Propulsion Control Systems
5.2 F/A-18E/F Lateral PIO and Resulting Control Law Changes
TitleF/A-18E/F Lateral PIO and Resulting Control Law Changes
PresenterShawn Donley and Ron DeMand
AffiliationNAVAIR and Boeing, respectively
Available Downloads*presentation
video
*Downloads are available to members who are logged in and either Active or attended this meeting.
AbstractDuring the second sea trials of the F/A-18E/F in March 1999, a single instance of a lateral pilot induced oscillation (PIO) was experienced on short final to the carrier. The trigger event appeared to be unexpected crosswind conditions. Post flight data analysis showed this to be a classic Category II rate saturation PIO, with the ailerons at their software and hardware rate limits, and the differential stabilators at their software rate limits. Attempts to duplicate the PIO in a fixed base simulator and during land-based flight testing were unsuccessful. To mitigate the PIO potential, the aileron and stabilator software rate and position limiters were replaced with a phase compensated rate and position limiter algorithm. This algorithm is an adaptation of an approach patented by the US Navy in 1989. The benefits and characteristics of the phase compensated rate limiter were presented. Embedding the actuator command position limit within the phase compensated rate limiter provides significant advantages over a phase compensated rate limiter alone.



Copyright © 2024 | Question? webmaster@acgsc.org